以下为《阅读简答题做题方法分享》的无排版文字预览,完整格式请下载
下载前请仔细阅读文字预览以及下方图片预览。图片预览是什么样的,下载的文档就是什么样的。
阅读简答题做题方法分享
主旨题
What is the message of the passage? 文章主旨是什么?
(1) I was standing in my kitchen wondering what to have for lunch when my friend Taj called.
(2) “Sit down,” she said.
(3) I thought she was going to tell me she had just gotten the haircut from hell. I laughed and said, “It can't be that bad.”
(4) But it was. Before the phone call, I had 30 years of retirement savings in a “safe” fund with a brilliant financial guru(金融大亨). When I put down the phone, my savings were gone. I felt as if I had died and, for some unknown reason, was still breathing.
(5) Since Bernie Madoff’s arrest on charges of running a $65 million Ponzi scheme, I've read many articles about how we investors should have known what was going on. I wish I could say I had reservations about Madoff before “the Call”, but I did not. (前半部分叙述了作者的遭遇)
(6) On New Year’s Eve, three weeks after we lost our savings, six of us Madoff people gathered at Taj's house for dinner. As we were sitting around the table, someone asked, “If you could have your money back right now, but it would mean giving up what you have learned by losing it, would you take the money or would you take what losing the money has given you?”
(7) My husband was still in financial shock. He said, “I just want the money back.” I wasn't certain where I stood. I knew that losing our money had cracked me wide open. I'd been walking around like what the Buddhists call a hungry ghost: always focused on the bite that was yet to come, not the one in my mouth. No matter how much I ate or had or experienced, it didn't satisfy me, because I wasn't really taking it in, wasn't absorbing it. Now I was forced to pay attention. Still, I couldn’t honestly say that if someone had offered me the money back, I would turn it down.
(8) But the other four all said that what they were seeing about themselves was incalculable, and they didn't think it would have become apparent without the ground of financial stability being ripped out from underneath them.
(9) My friend Michael said, “I’d started to get complacent. It’s as if the muscles of my heart started to atrophy(萎缩). Now they're' awake, alive- and I don't want to go back.”
(10) These weren’t just empty words. Michael and his wife needed to take in boarders to meet their expenses. Taj was so broke that she was moving into someone’s garage apartment in three weeks. Three friends had declared bankruptcy and weren’t sure where or how they were going to live. (后半部分谈论了作者和她的朋友们对此遭遇的看法。)
“失与得”
获得的领悟与教训要比损失的金钱更为重要。
Understanding gained is more important than money lost.
(2015年真题)
What does the passage mainly discuss? 本文主要讨论了什么?
(1)Attachment Parenting is not Indulgent Parenting. Attachment parents do not “spoil” their children. Spoiling is done when a child is given everything that they want regardless of what they need and regardless of what is practical. Indulgent parents give toys for tantrums(发脾气),ice cream for breakfast Attachment parents don't give their children everything that they want, they give their children everything that they need. Attachment parents believe that love and comfort are free and necessary. Not sweets or toys.(与溺爱育儿法进行对比)
(2)Attachment Parenting is not "afraid of tears" parenting. Our kids cry. The difference is that we understand that tantrums and tears come from emotions and not manipulation. And our children understand this too. They cry and have tantrums sometimes, of course. But they do this because their emotions are so overwhelming that they need to get it out They do not expect to be "rewarded" for their strong negative emotions; they simply expect that we will listen. We pick up our babies when they cry, and we respond to the tears of our older children because we believe firmly that comfort is free, love is free, and that when a child has need for comfort and love, it is our job to provide those things. We are not afraid of tears. We don't avoid them. We hold our children through them and teach them that when they are hurt or frustrated we are here to comfort them and help them work through their emotions.(与“惧怕眼泪”的育儿法进行对比)
(3)Attachment Parents is not Clingy Parenting. I do not cling to my children. In fact, I'm pretty free-range. As soon as they can move they usually move away from me and let me set up a chase as they crawl, run, skip and hop on their merry way to explore the world. Sure, I carry them and hug them and chase them and kiss them and rock than and sleep with them. But this is not me following them everywhere and pulling them back to me. This is me being a home base. The "attachment" comes from their being allowed to attach to us, not from us attaching to than like parental leeches.(与黏孩子育儿法进行对比)
(4)Attachment Parenting is not Selfish Parenting. It is also not selfless parenting. We are not doing it for us, and we are not doing it to torment ourselves.(与自私育儿法和无私育儿法进行对比)
(5)Attachment parenting is not Helicopter Parenting. I don't hover. I supervise. I follow, I teach, I demonstrate, I explain. I don't slap curious hands away. I show how to do things safely. I let my child do the things that my child wishes to do, first with help and then with supervision and finally with trust. I don't insist that my 23 month old hold my hand when we walk on the sidewalk because I know I can recall him with my voice because he trusts me to allow him to explore and he trusts me to explain when something is dangerous and to help him satisfy his curiosities safely.(与直升机式育儿法进行对比)
(6)Most of the negative things that I hear about "attachment parents" are completely off-base and describe something that is entirely unlike Attachment Parenting. Attachment Parenting is child-centric and focuses on the needs of the child. Children need structure, rules, and boundaries. Attachment Parents simply believe that the child and the parent are allies, not adversaries. And that children are taught, not trained.(?对Attachment?Parenting?做总结及评价)
多种育儿法,逐一与亲密育儿法进行比较。
Different types of parenting.
语义题
According to the context, what is the meaning of “beside the point”?
(1) For anyone who doubts that the texting revolution is upon us, consider this: The average 13- to 17-year-old sends and receives 3,339 texts a month—more than 100 per day, according to the Nielsen Co., the media research firm. Adults are catching up. People from age 45 to 54 sent and received 323 texts a month in the second quarter of 2010, up 75% from a year ago, Nielsen says.
(2) Behind the texting explosion is a fundamental shift in how we view our mobile devices. That they are phones is increasingly beside the point.
(3) Part of what’s driving the texting surge among adults is the popularity of social media. Sites like Twitter, with postings of no more than 140 characters, are creating and reinforcing the habit of communicating in micro-bursts.
(4) Economics has much to do with texting’s popularity. Text messages cost carriers less than traditional mobile voice transmissions, and so they cost users less. Sprint Nextel has reconceived its Virgin Mobile brand to cater to heavy texters in a difficult economy. For $25 per month, users get unlimited texting, email, social networking and 300 talk minutes; for another $15, they get an additional 900 talk minutes. The name of the brand’s new wireless plan: “Beyond Talk.”
(5) Texting’s rise over conversation is changing the way we interact, social scientists and researchers say. We are now inclined to text to relay difficult information. We stare at our phone when we want to avoid eve contact. Rather than make plans in advance, we engage in what researchers have named “micro-coordination”— “I’ll txt u in 10 mins when I know wh/restrnt.”
(6) Texting saves us time, but it steals from quiet reflection. “When people have a mobile device and have even a little extra time, they will communicate with someone in their life,” says Lee Rainie, Director of the Pew Internet and American Life Project.
(7) And the phone conversation will never be completely out. Deal makers and 内容过长,仅展示头部和尾部部分文字预览,全文请查看图片预览。 uld be portable to carry from dining room table to bedroom. Will virtual living eventually mean the death of filing "People who have cookbooks still like to pull out recipes and save them," says Kim Oser, a Gaithersburg professional organizer, "just like people who love their GPS still like looking at a map."
(9)"In our lifetime, we will still have paper and still have filing," Oser adds. "One hundred years from now? Who knows."
文件管理
Paper Organizing/ Organizing Paper/ Paper Management/ Filing
[文章尾部最后500字内容到此结束,中间部分内容请查看底下的图片预览]
以上为《阅读简答题做题方法分享》的无排版文字预览,完整格式请下载
下载前请仔细阅读上面文字预览以及下方图片预览。图片预览是什么样的,下载的文档就是什么样的。