以下为《Peer Review Form_Methods》的无排版文字预览，完整格式请下载

下载前请仔细阅读文字预览以及下方图片预览。图片预览是什么样的，下载的文档就是什么样的。

HDFS 492 – Methods and Timetable

YOUR NAME

Yifan Niu



PEER YOU ARE REVIEWING

Keeley Powers



In the chart below, you will see the required components of each section listed. As a peer-reviewer, it is your responsibility to read your peer’s drafts carefully and take notes as to which information is present, and the level of detail, depth, and quality of that information. For the first column (“is this information present?”), simply reply “YES” or “NO.” For the second column, use the following scale:

NONE: No information provided

EMERGING: Some information on this sub-topic is provided, but may be lacking in detail, depth, and/or quality of writing

DEVELOPING: Information on this topic is provided and generally clear and easy to read. The writer may need to spend some more time fully developing this idea.

EXCELLENT: The information is clearly written, detailed, and easy to understand.

Methods

Is this information present? (Y/N)

Using the scale above, describe the level of detail/depth to which your peer provided this information



Introduction – research base, description of activities, program site

Y

EXCELLENCE



Program Staff and Training – comprehensive who will oversee, coordinate, evaluate, develop, schedule market, recruit & lead



Y

EXCELLENCE



Program activities – 3-4 sentence description

Y

EXCELLENCE



In depth description of one session

Y

EXCELLENCE



Schedule – 1-2 sentence description of EACH session

YE

EXCELLENCE





If you p 内容过长，仅展示头部和尾部部分文字预览，全文请查看图片预览。 nstrate on each sessions and activities



List at least ONE concern or area for growth you see in these sections overall:

I think it’s great overall, you have brought so many useful ideas and great program design plans



Do you have any questions or additional tips for your peer?





[文章尾部最后300字内容到此结束,中间部分内容请查看底下的图片预览]

以上为《Peer Review Form_Methods》的无排版文字预览，完整格式请下载

下载前请仔细阅读上面文字预览以及下方图片预览。图片预览是什么样的，下载的文档就是什么样的。